No. In the first place, the question assumes that we would not have devised alternatives to animal use if that were necessary either because nonhuman animals were not available or because we made a moral decision not to exploit them as resources. Second, even if animal use were necessary for society as we presently know it, the same argument could be made with respect to any human activity. For example, without wars, patriarchy, and other forms of violence and exploitation, we would not have society as we now know it. The fact that a given activity was a necessary means to what some of us regard as a desirable end does not prove that the means were morally justified. Present-day Americans would not enjoy the level of prosperity that they now enjoy were it not for human slavery; that does not mean that slavery was a morally acceptable practice. Third, there is at least an argument that our present-day society, with its violence, pollution, inequitable distribution of resources, and various forms of injustice is less desirable an end than some think, and that we ought not be so eager to endorse the means that got us where we are today.
http://www.vegankit.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/logo-300x87.png 0 0 email@example.com http://www.vegankit.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/logo-300x87.png firstname.lastname@example.org 23:52:542015-02-20 23:52:54If we did not exploit animals, we would not have society as we now know it. Does this fact not prove that animal use by humans is morally justified?